The Dvorak layout was designed in 1936 specifically to be faster and more ergonomic than QWERTY. Eighty-nine years later, QWERTY still dominates. So who's right — the engineers who designed Dvorak, or the billions of people who never switched? Here's the honest answer.
The Dvorak Simplified Keyboard places the most common English letters on the home row — AOEUI on the left, DHTNS on the right. The idea: your fingers travel less distance, reducing fatigue and increasing speed. On QWERTY, your fingers travel roughly 2 miles per day of typing. On Dvorak, that drops to about 1 mile.
The evidence is genuinely mixed. Some studies show Dvorak users type 5–10% faster after full proficiency. Others show no significant difference. The most honest conclusion: Dvorak has a theoretical ergonomic advantage, but the real-world speed difference is smaller than its proponents claim.
The world typing record (212 WPM, Barbara Blackburn) was set on Dvorak — but the top competitive typists online mostly use QWERTY. Both layouts can reach elite speeds.
Colemak is a modern alternative that changes only 17 keys from QWERTY (vs Dvorak's near-complete rearrangement). It keeps common shortcuts like Ctrl+Z/X/C/V in place and has a growing community of fast typists. Many people who want to switch from QWERTY find Colemak a more practical middle ground.
Before making any layout decision, know your current baseline. Take a test on TypeForge and see where you actually stand. Most people discover they have significant room to improve on QWERTY before any layout switch makes sense.
Test Your Speed Now →